Not long ago I sat down for an initial negotiation with a real estate company in the United States. They were good people, professional and polite, and I genuinely enjoyed the meeting. Things moved along smoothly until one of them leaned forward and said: “Last year we closed a deal at a much higher valuation, so how can we possibly agree to your proposal? Our company has grown significantly since then.”
That line was meant to set the tone. Their point was simple. If they had already completed a deal at a rich valuation, then surely I should respect that number and pay up. At first, it sounded logical. After all, past deals often set benchmarks for the future. But not all deals are created equal. Some are cash-based, tested by the market. Others are barter deals, where assets are swapped, and the valuations written on paper tell a very different story.
The Story of Their Past Deal
The deal they bragged about was not a cash purchase. They had acquired a multifamily project, and instead of paying cash, they issued equity in their own company to the seller. In other words, they bought a project and paid with stock.
On paper, this valued the company at one hundred and twenty million dollars. In our negotiation, I was talking about something closer to thirty million. The gap was enormous. They saw my number as a deep cut. I saw their number as inflated from the start.
A Negotiation Tip
Before we go deeper, here is a quick tip for anyone negotiating real estate transactions. Try not to get stuck in a valuation fight. If one side says one hundred and twenty million and the other side says thirty million, emotions rise, positions harden, and productive conversation ends.
It is often smarter to take valuation off the table altogether. Instead of arguing about price, talk about structure, rights, timing, or control. There are many creative ways to frame a deal without anchoring everything on a headline number. I will share some of those strategies in future posts.
For now, remember that fighting over numbers almost always turns into a dead end. Better to analyze the logic behind the numbers than to get dragged into a tug-of-war.
The Dog and the Cats
To show how misleading barter deals can be, let me use a story. Imagine I once had a dog. I sold him for one million dollars. How could a dog be worth one million? Easy. I traded him for two cats, each supposedly worth five hundred thousand dollars.
Does that really tell you the dog is worth one million? Does it tell you the cats are worth five hundred thousand each? Of course not. It only tells you that someone was willing to trade.
This is how many corporate barter deals work. One side contributes a project. The other side contributes stock. Both sides record inflated numbers because it helps them tell a stronger story. But those numbers rarely reflect true market value.
What Barter Looks Like in Real Estate
In American real estate, barter deals are not just theory. They happen all the time.
A developer contributes land. A partner contributes shares in a holding company. A seller trades his equity in one multifamily project for a minority stake in a broader portfolio. Or two investors swap properties, one in Phoenix for another in Miami.
On paper, the valuations can look spectacular. But underneath, the swap is more about convenience than about true price discovery. If both parties are already motivated to trade, the exact values become secondary.
Sometimes both sides even prefer to inflate the numbers. If writing a bigger number on paper helps set a higher benchmark for the next deal, why not? Both sides benefit from the illusion, so both sides play along.
Inflated Benchmarks
That was the situation in my meeting. Their past deal looked glamorous. They could proudly claim: “Our company was valued at one hundred and twenty million.” But that number came from a barter swap, not a cash transaction.
The seller of the project wanted to show he had sold at a high price. The buyer, meaning the company across the table from me, wanted to show it was worth more. Both had the same incentive. The number became a story, not a fact.
That does not make them dishonest. It simply reflects the nature of barter. Numbers are flexible when cash is not involved.
Why You Should Be Skeptical
This is why I always tell investors to be cautious when they hear about past barter transactions. When someone claims a high valuation, ask how it was created. Was it cash paid in an open market? Or was it stock for project, asset for asset, cat for dog?
If it was barter, treat the valuation as theater. It might be a good story, but it is not proof of market value.
In American real estate especially, where capital stacks are complex and equity swaps are common, inflated benchmarks appear frequently. A joint venture may trumpet a big valuation, but if the structure was asset-for-shares, it does not necessarily mean the company is worth what they say.
Evaluating Each Asset on Its Own
The smarter approach is to analyze each asset separately. Forget the headline number. Ask: what is this project worth today in the open market? What would a neutral buyer pay for it in cash? And what is this company’s equity worth if it were sold in a transparent process?
By evaluating assets one by one, you cut through the inflation. You ground yourself in reality rather than narrative. Without that discipline, you risk building your decisions on numbers that were designed for storytelling, not truth.
A Practical Example
Consider two investors, each with ten million dollars.
The first buys a garden-style apartment complex in Dallas. The deal is straightforward. He pays cash. The valuation is tested by the market. He will manage tenants, collect rent, and benefit directly from appreciation. His exposure is real estate.
The second investor trades ten million dollars’ worth of stock in his private company for a property in Charlotte. On paper, the deal values his company at one hundred million. He proudly points to this number in his next negotiation. But in reality, the valuation is artificial. It was born of barter, not of cash.
Both can claim they are in real estate. But only the first has a market-tested valuation. The second has a story.
The Bigger Lesson
The lesson here is bigger than barter. It is about the role of numbers in negotiation. Numbers are not always facts. They are often narratives.
When someone cites a past deal, always ask how it was structured. Cash transactions tested in the market are facts. Barter swaps are often theater.
In real estate, where creativity is part of the game, you will encounter plenty of dog-and-cat deals. Smile at the story, but do not anchor your decisions on it.
Final Thought
So did I slash their value by suggesting thirty million when they insisted on one hundred and twenty? No. I simply refused to take their barter benchmark at face value. I chose to evaluate the company on its merits, not on a number inflated by the structure of a past swap.
That is the mindset every serious investor should adopt. Do not be dazzled by inflated barter valuations. Break down the deal. Understand the incentives. Focus on the assets themselves. That is how you avoid paying for two cats and thinking you bought a million-dollar dog.
👉 For more straight talk on real estate and finance, based on real deals not theory, hit subscribe to Getting Real with Peleg.
Leave a Reply